Cybersecurity

Traditional vs. Machine-led attack chains

Usman
Placeholder for UsmanUsman

Usman , Solution Lead Cybersecurity , Nomios Netherlands

6 min. read
Placeholder for Traditional vs. machine-led attack chainsTraditional vs. machine-led attack chains

Share

Gone are the days when cyberattacks were the work of lone hackers, meticulously navigating each step of a manual cyber kill chain. Today, cyber threats have evolved into high-speed, automated assaults, powered by AI and machine learning, capable of infiltrating systems in seconds.

The growth of automated hacking tools has redefined cybersecurity as we know it, creating a landscape where machine-driven threats operate faster and more efficiently than ever before.

To better understand this shift, it's important to compare how traditional cyberattacks were structured versus how modern, AI-driven attacks unfold.

What is a traditional cyber kill chain?

The traditional cyber kill chain is a linear model that outlines the sequential steps an attacker typically follows to breach a system. Developed by Lockheed Martin, it includes stages like reconnaissance, weaponisation, delivery, exploitation, installation, command and control, and actions on objectives.

Each phase requires a high degree of manual input and technical expertise, with attackers often spending considerable time researching targets and tailoring payloads. While effective in mapping traditional threats, this model assumes a human-paced approach to attacks.

What is a new machine-led attack chain?

In contrast, the machine-led attack chain is driven by automation, AI, and machine learning. This modern approach dramatically speeds up each stage of the attack, from scanning and targeting to exploitation and command and control.

Machine-led attacks can autonomously adapt to environments, develop or modify payloads in real time, and launch broad-scale campaigns with minimal human oversight. These capabilities make the attack chain dynamic, scalable, and far more difficult to predict or stop using traditional defence models.

A comparison between traditional and machine-led attack chain

Let's dive into a side-by-side comparison of the traditional cyber kill chain and the new machine-led attack chain, highlighting key differences and the implications for modern cybersecurity defences.

StageTraditional cyber kill chainNew machine-led attack chain
ReconnaissanceAttackers manually gather information on potential targets, mapping vulnerabilities through open-source intelligence (OSINT), network scanning, or social engineering. This process is often time-consuming and reliant on human judgment to prioritise targets.Automated bots powered by AI scan networks and systems at unprecedented speeds, collecting vast amounts of data on a target’s infrastructure. These bots can identify and prioritise vulnerabilities without human intervention, instantly preparing for further stages.
WeaponisationAttackers craft custom payloads or malicious code specific to a target’s vulnerabilities. This often requires deep knowledge of the target’s environment and may involve complex scripting.Machine-learning algorithms automatically select or modify payloads based on real-time analysis of the target’s systems. Tools like polymorphic malware adapt on the fly, morphing into forms optimised for each environment, minimising detection risk.
DeliveryDelivery is manually executed through targeted phishing campaigns, malicious attachments, or exploiting known vulnerabilities. The reach is often limited to specific targets due to the manual effort involved.Automated spear-phishing campaigns, exploit kits, and worm-like malware are deployed at massive scale, capable of reaching thousands of targets at once. AI-driven delivery mechanisms also adapt messages and payloads to avoid detection and optimise delivery success rates.
ExploitationExploiting a vulnerability in the target’s system requires deep technical expertise, often involving manual exploitation of identified weaknesses. The success rate can vary depending on the attacker’s skill.Self-propagating malware and AI-enhanced tools exploit vulnerabilities without human input. They can leverage known and unknown vulnerabilities, deploying exploits at scale and adapting to each target environment based on defenses detected in real-time.
InstallationMalware installation is often manual and requires persistence from attackers to avoid detection. Attackers must hide their payload within the system and ensure it remains functional after initial installation.Machine-learning-powered malware autonomously installs itself and initiates self-propagation. Some payloads modify their code to bypass defenses or establish deeper footholds. Machine-driven malware also adapts to network environments to persist even against active defenses.
Command and Control (C2)Attackers establish a command-and-control channel, often manually setting up protocols to communicate with malware on the compromised system. C2 setup is often static, making it easier to detect.Modern C2 systems are decentralised, adaptive, and highly resilient. Using techniques like fast-flux DNS and encrypted communication, AI-driven malware maintains robust C2 channels, enabling attackers to issue real-time commands to infected systems, continuously learning from and adapting to defense measures.
Actions on ObjectivesAttackers manually exfiltrate data, modify systems, or deploy ransomware, often relying on customised actions for each system. This requires deep knowledge of the target’s environment, making it time-intensive.Machine-led attacks use automation to execute actions based on pre-set goals like data exfiltration, encryption, or lateral movement. These AI-driven tools assess and act on opportunities without human oversight, often scaling operations across multiple environments rapidly and with minimal exposure.

How to defend against modern attack chains?

To defend against both traditional and machine-led attack chains, organisations need to adopt a proactive, layered security approach. This includes implementing real-time threat detection and response capabilities, leveraging AI and machine learning for anomaly detection, and embracing frameworks like Zero Trust.

Continuous network monitoring, regular patching, employee awareness training, and automated incident response play a vital role in disrupting the speed and sophistication of modern attacks. Staying ahead means modernising your defences to match the pace and power of today’s threats. Read more about defending against machine-led attacks in my next article.

Get in touch

Do you want to know more about this topic?

Our experts and sales teams are at your service. Leave your contact information and we will get back to you shortly.

Call now
Placeholder for Portrait of french manPortrait of french man
Updates

More updates